Mr Tyndall goes outside the law to refuse to investigate my
complaints against Tallaght Hospital and others:
Having had my well documented complaints for a year the Ombudsman close-off my complaints without investigation, indicating that I'd withdrawn my complaints to the Ombudsman. This was to be the first of three 'grounds' the Ombudsman was to use.
This
was a complete and known falsehood as I had only recently written to the
Ombudsman pressing for a full and complete investigation.
The Ombudsman ignored my
immediate challenge to this false claim.
It
was only after my MEP made representation on my behalf that notice was taken of
my challenge and the Ombudsman informed my MEP that the decision would be
reviewed on the grounds that the Ombudsman had not upheld my complaint [yet
there had been no investigation] - this was the second of three 'grounds'.
After
said review I was informed that the Ombudsman had decided not to investigate my
complaints because I could not prove I'd made a phone call to the hospital on
9/4/10 [I had proven I'd made and taped the call] - this was the third of three 'grounds'. This refusal despite
the fact that the call had no bearing on major parts of my complaints.
# For example - Dr Noel/Tallaght
Hospital knowing for about 9 months that I'd not had the treatment he said he
had requested the hospital book me in for [no one bothering to do anything
about it]. Dr Noel stated that the bookings had never been made.
# For example - the
hospital suddenly discovering and producing, for the first time, a letter in
Nov 2011 'proving' that I'd refused treatment on 1/4/10. This was claimed to be
a copy of a letter Dr Noel sent to my G.P. - however it actually contradicted
the only letter received by my G.P.
The
letter dated 1/4/10 received by my G.P. confirmed that on 1/4/10 Dr Noel
offered me - treatment ASAP depending on when a bed became available.
The
newly discovered letter contradicted this and said that on 1/4/10 Dr Noel had
offered me - immediate admission for treatment but I refused the offer.
I
had already written to the Ombudsman stating that I believed they were looking
for excuses to get rid of my complaints. These examples were just two of the
stumbling blocks the Ombudsman would find it impossible to circumvent if he
were to investigate.
The
problem is that Tallaght Hospital etc usually has two contradictory versions of
various events or matters and their earlier version supports my version. So
whichever version the Ombudsman accepted the hospital etc was in trouble and if
the later false version was accepted how would the Ombudsman explain away the
earlier true version?
On
Dec 6th I Emailed and asked Mr P. Tyndall the Ombudsman to explain to my MEP
and me these extraordinary actions and since he was seemingly operating outside
the law to indicate the relevant parts of his legislation he was relying on. As
matters were obviously serious I requested an acknowledgement.
Mr Tyndall totally ignored
me.
On
Dec 16th I Emailed Mr Tyndall and requested he acknowledge receipt of my Email
of Dec 6th and to respond.
Mr Tyndall totally ignored
me.
So
the people who have denied me my Rights walk off scot free, including Tallaght
Hospital who has left me crippled. All because the Ombudsman declines to
carry-out his duties and ignores the wealth of documentary evidence and that
includes proven falsified documentation from Tallaght Hospital.
Even
though I'm now well into my 5th year of hell, left crippled with seriously
impaired mobility all efforts are seemingly channelled into covering up
negligence, indifference etc that has left my health destroyed.
William
M. Trent. williammtrent@yahoo.ie
No comments:
Post a Comment