Medical Council's solicitors party to a cover-up:

Falsified medical records - Medical Council's solicitors party to a cover-up:

The Medical Council and Dr J. Noel's falsified medical records

It's now over a year since I made formal requests for records/documentation to the Medical Council and my request to the Data Protection Commissioner is still outstanding, the following is based upon the records in my possession - although it's clear that records are being withheld.

It was decided that Dr Noel had no case to answer even though his medical records of 1/4/10 contradict his letter of 1/4/10 received by my G.P. - a letter that supports my claims regarding what treatment he offered me.

The Medical Council rejected my complaint that Dr J. Noel of Tallaght Hospital had falsified the medical records for 1/4/10. The following is proven by official documentation.

[1] Although his letter confirmed he had offered me treatment ASAP depending on when a bed became available Dr Noel told the Medical Council's Ms Amanda Mc Guinness that he wanted his letter of 1/4/10 to my G.P. to be read not as that but as he had actually offered me immediate treatment which I refused.

[2] The Medical Council's solicitor Ms Finola O'Dwyer certified internally and put forward as evidence that Dr Noel's letter of 1/4/10 to my G.P. did confirm he had offered me immediate treatment and that I agreed with that - a double proven falsehood.

[3] The Medical Council's solicitor Mr Diarmuid Coen certified that they did have this documentary evidence, that I had agreed with Dr Noel and all their actions were lawful. He also indicated that they were accepting Dr Noel's medical records of 1/4/10 as being true and rejected Dr Noel's letter to my G.P. which he had written at the consultation on 1/4/10 in Tallaght Hospital.

[4] The Information Commissioner's legally binding decision was that the Council did not have the evidence they claimed they had, that I had not agreed with Dr Noel and they had materially incorrectly described my complaint.

Despite accepting this legally binding decision/ruling the Council stand by their decision to clear Dr Noel - proving that was their intention all along no matter what documentary evidence I had.

Two major points are, that Dr Noel was never asked to explain why his letter to my G.P. that confirms my claims and written at the 1/4/10 consultation contradicts his medical records he claims were written at the exact same time.

And,

The Medical Council never explained why they rejected the evidence Dr Noel's letter of 1/4/10 written to and received by my G.P.

As the Medical Council sets the standards for the medical profession this proves that integrity is only optional for the profession as it is for the Council and their staff.

I'm left crippled for life and now in my 7th month of being totally housebound.

I have given Prof. Freddie Wood and Ms Finola O'Dwyer the opportunity to respond.

Medical Councils policy of altering records etc:

Medical Council's criminal activity to cover-up for Tallaght Hospital's Dr J. Noel:

Activity officially confirmed by their solicitor Mr Diarmuid Coen:

The Council's solicitor, Mr D. Coen, confirmed that they were accepting Dr Noel's uncorroborated word that he had offered me immediate treatment which I refused - even though I denied this offer and my G.P. confirmed that this contradicted what he told her.

In order to support Dr Noel's 'word' the Council altered my complaint and evidence and claimed they had evidence from me - evidence they admit never existed.

All this is proven by internal Council documents and the Information Commissioners legally binding decision.

Having left me crippled for life by his criminal negligence Dr J. Noel changed his story and was protected by the Council.

Mr D. Coen. Solicitor - the Council accepts Dr Noel's word:

The Council's solicitor, Mr D. Coen, wrote to me confirming that they were accepting Dr Noel's word - even though his word was the opposite to what was in his letter received by my G.P., a letter written at the consultation which confirmed what I said Dr Noel had offered me - treatment ASAP depending on when a bed became available. I lodged said letter with the Council proving my complaint. But the Council changed my evidence.

Mr Coen also insisted that everything they had done was perfectly legal and insisted that my evidence and my complaint agreed with Dr Noel - when they clearly were the opposite.

Therefore the Council's actions regarding me were confirmed as official policy.

Medical Council's criminal actions:

In order to accept Dr Noel's word they mis-described my complaint and evidence by falsely claiming I said that my evidence agreed with Dr Noel and that the letter I lodged as evidence confirmed that Dr Noel had offered me immediate treatment which I refused.

This was a complete fabrication and I challenged the Council and requested they produce the documents proving what they claimed - they refused, standing by their decision to clear Dr Noel.

This was the only way the Council could get rid of the irrefutable evidence of Dr Noel's letter to my G.P. in order to accept his uncorroborated word and clear him.

Information Commissioner finds against the Council:

In the legally binding decision [case 120243] the Council acknowledged that they had incorrectly described my complaint and evidence and that they did not have the documentary evidence they claimed they had, in fact it never existed.

Confirmation of the Council's criminal actions:

Despite all this the Council still stands by their decision to clear Dr J. Noel - proving beyond any reasonable doubt that they intended to side with Dr Noel from the very outset, no matter how damming the evidence was.

A major point is that at no time was Dr Noel's proven self contradiction questioned or explained.

# Now that the Data Protection Commissioner has admitted that her decision made against me over 4 years ago, regarding Tallaght Hospital, was wrong and has now reversed it and ordered an investigation into the hospital, one wonders how much longer the Council and Prof Wood will be let continue and stand by their criminal activities.

# I have provided [through info@mcirl.ie] Prof F. Wood with the link to this article in order to ensure that she has the opportunity to personally respond and I formally request his full response.

# I have provided [through info@mcirl.ie] Dr A. Dillon with the link to this article as she is the Chair of the Ethics and Professionalism Committee and my case proves that the Council is morally bankrupt. Given her position I request that she personally responds.

Data Protection Commissioner a full official review:

I have been formally informed that Ms Dixon, the Data Protection Commissioner, has ordered an immediate full review of matters and has appointed Mr John Keyes, Assistant Commissioner & Head of Investigations to personally undertake this.

The review is to commence immediately and a substantive response is promised within the next two weeks.